Why Computation?
Building Bridges, Not Walls
Origins of The Language of Computation by Gary Stager
Lest you doubt the conviviality of the Reggio Emilia Approach® and the constructionist approach to computation advocated by Constructing Modern Knowledge, a recently published book, Loris Malaguzzi and the Teachers: Dialogues on Collaboration and Conflict among Children, Reggio Emilia 1990, includes a chapter in which Loris Malaguzzi, the father of the Reggio Emilia Approach®, and teachers discuss the documentation of young Reggio Children programming in Logo – in 1990!
Seemingly conflicting impulses, philosophies, paths, and powerful ideas ultimately converge April 14-17, 2025 to create a very special event, The Language of Computation – Constructing Modern Knowledge in Reggio Emilia.
I have been aware of the Reggio Emilia and a student of its educational approach since the mid-1990s. Our daughter attended a “Reggio-inspired” school and Reggio Emilia inspired my doctoral research with Seymour Papert in which we created a utopian school for severely at-risk learners inside a troubled prison for teens based on his theory of constructionism. Decades ago, Papert, his colleagues, and the early childhood educators of Reggio Emilia independently laid the foundation for what became known as the maker movement.
In 2009, I paid my own way to Reggio Emilia for the first of what would become many trips to one of the greatest places on earth. During that official study tour, I found myself in the office of Carla Rinaldi, President of Fondazione Reggio Emilia, who after exchanging pleasantries informed me that “Seymour Papert sat in the exact same seat you are in.” A connection was made – not just an interpersonal one, but a convergence of intellectual traditions and ideals. Over time, Carla participated in two Constructing Modern Knowledge institutes as did Lella Gandini. Most recently, the next generation of wise Reggio educators was represented at CMK by Barbara Donicci and Elena Sofia Paoli. The Language of Computation is a collaboration fifteen years in the making.
Constructing Modern Knowledge was born out of a desire, shared with Seymour Papert, to build a bridge between noble progressive educational traditions and the affordances of modernity. The educators of Reggio Emilia don’t hide from the challenges or opportunities of the contemporary milieu, but seek ways to engage even the youngest children constructively in their world. This fearless and optimistic embrace of the future, warts and all, sets the Reggio Emilia Approach® apart and may explain its longevity as a movement.
In my various encounters with Reggio, I noticed mathematics and mathematical fluency were not given the same level of careful attention dedicated to the arts, literacy, and even science. One of the languages of children seemed missing. This is not an indictment of the Reggio Emilia Approach®, quite the contrary. Mathematics is the pain point for most if not all efforts at schooling, even the most progressive efforts.
The question of why schools, even the best most creative and child-centered ones offer such impoverished computational experiences or why it is acceptable for children to “hate math,” is not particularly interesting or efficacious. A better use of our precious time might be better spent creating a new menu of computational experiences that are mathematically nutritious.
Seymour Papert recognized this conflict and dedicated much of his professional career to doing something about it. Many of Papert’s efforts from helping Piaget understand how children construct mathematical knowledge, to the invention of the Logo programming language and the first LEGO robotics materials for children, to advocacy for every child to have a personal laptop computer, were aimed at realizing a vision of “Mathland” in which learning mathematics would be as natural as growing up in France and speaking French. No one would think to accuse a French child of “not having a head for French.” Perhaps most importantly, in that context, French would be a powerful instrument for learning, doing, and navigating the world.
In a multitude of ways, computers can create the conditions for Mathland and beyond. Ubiquitous computing, generative AI, programming environments accessible to children, a world awash in information, low-cost robotics platforms like the BBC micro:bit, and limitless possibilities for collaboration across space and time can supercharge learning. Our colleagues in Reggio Emilia have much to offer in learning how to do so safely, morally, and with the rights of each child at the center of our efforts. The Language of Computation institute plans to create experiences that multiply the Reggio Emilia approach and Papert’s unfinished legacy of computational empowerment for learners of all ages. This new intellectual terrain is fertile ground for participatory action research and traditional scholarship.
“Across the globe there is a love affair between children and the digital technologies. They love the computers, they love the phones, they love the game machines, and – most relevantly here – their love translates into a willingness to do a prodigious quantity of learning. The idea that this love might be mobilized in the service of the goals of educators has escaped no one. Unfortunately, it is so tempting that great energy and money has been poured into doing it in superficial and self-defeating ways – such as trying to trick children into learning what they have rejected by embedding it in a game. Nobody is fooled. The goal should not be to sugar coat the math they hate but offer them a math they can love.” – Seymour Papert (2006)
Just as I sat in the seat previously occupied by Seymour Papert, computing in the spirit of Constructing Modern Knowledge has long occupied a place in the schools of Reggio.
This prescient and profound 1991 address by Seymour Papert (above) is 100% consistent with the traditions of the Reggio Emilia Approach® and does a better job than I ever could of conveying the need for this event.
Mathematics is a way of making sense of the world and computers are the way we make mathematics. The act of computation allows learners to solve problems, create, invent, investigate, and add interactivity and intelligence to everyday objects. If previous generations of children could make a dinosaur out of cereal boxes, computational materials invite today’s kids to “bring their dinosaur to life” – to sing, dance, engage in conversation, or send a text message to Grandma. It would be shameful to deprive children of such agency.
For these reasons, The Language of Computation institute will feature:
- programming experiences combining art, culture, geometry, and design
- linguistic play and probabilistic thinking
- prompt setting and invention with the BBC micro:bit, Hummingbird Robotics Kits, recycled and traditional craft materials
- number theory experiments
- knowledge co-construction with artificial intelligence
Each of these hands-on project-based experienes are in addition to the activities organized by our Reggio Emilian colleagues. (see the schedule on the front page of this web site).
“Reggio successfully challenges so many false dichotomies — art versus science, individual versus community, child versus adult, enjoyment versus study, nuclear family versus extended family; by achieving a unique harmony that spans these contrasts, it reconfigures our sclerotic categorical systems.” – Howard Gardner
Computation invites even very young children to be mathematicians, rather than being taught Math; as it does the same for being a historian vs. a student in History class or being taught about music rather than playing an instrument in an orchestra.
The act of computation challenges other false dichotomies — teacher versus learner, fantasy versus fact, intention versus serendipity, complexity versus accessibility, work versus play, screens versus active engagement, childhood versus competence… It should come as naturally for children to be mathematicians as it is for adult mathematicians to be childlike. The Language of Computation endeavors to refute such paradoxes.
“Another way of describing what school does to children is infantilizing them. Treating them like children, so to speak. Now, one’s got to be careful about playing with that word. I think children should be treated like children… And being treated like children, in that sense, we should all be treated like children. School treats them like children in an impoverishing sense, where children are assumed to be people who don’t have good ideas, whose knowledge is limited. People who have to be told rather than exploring, discovering, creating, possessing knowledge.” – Seymour Papert (1991)